OCRegister.com
SUBSCRIBE | IN TODAY'S PAPER | E-REGISTER | CUSTOMER SERVICE | SIGN-IN | HELP | ADVERTISE
Search:
Lansner on Real Estate ~ The latest news about the housing market from Orange County Register columnist Jon Lansner.

O.C. homes now $200,000 below peak

September 5th, 2008, 12:57 am · 90 Comments · posted by Jon Lansner

Latest home-selling stats from DataQuick show for the 22 business days ended Aug. 20 shows that the median price is now at $445,000 — that’s $200,000, or 31%, below the peak of $645,000 hit in June 2007. As for other slices of the market:

  • Single-family homes are $234,000 (or 32%) below their peak of $734,000 hit in June 2007.
  • Condos are $140,000 (30%) below the $470,000 peak in March ‘06.
  • Newly built homes are $387,000 (45%) below a peak of $864,000 hit in February 2005.

The heavy discounting is moving product. O.C. homebuying runs 18% above the year-ago pace. July marked the first time since September 2005 that home sales exceeded the year-ago pace. (How did your ZIP code do? CLICK HERE for sortable chart.)

Here’s key results for the 22 business days ended Aug. 20 …

Slice Price Vs. ‘07 Sales Vs. ‘07
Houses $500,000 -29.6% 1,732 +28.0%
Condos $330,000 -26.7% 640 +22.8%
New $477,000 -23.7% 110 -52.2%
All $445,000 -30.5% 2,482 +18.0%

Check out other pricing news …

… or August’s most viewed posts from Lansner on Real Estate …

1. California’s home-price fall worst in U.S.
2. Few foreclosure refugees headed for apartments
3. Beach homes become O.C.’s slowest sellers
4. Long commute. good bye O.C.
5. O.C. single-family house price back under $500,000

90 Comments

90 Comments

  • Troy says:

    And the crash continues.

    Look at Ladera Ranch, down 34% in the last year. Since my Mom lived there from ‘02 to ‘06, I am always fascinated by the ongoing price crash and sales slide in Ladera. I’ve never seen a bigger bunch of wannabe’s than in Ladera.

    But Ladera can’t hold a candle to Newport Coast, with a 43% decline in prices and an even bigger slide in total sales compared to a year ago.

    These figures, zip by zip, are really just fascinating.

    Cue someone from the RE industry to step in and tell us these statistics don’t mean much and are very misleading, in 3…2…1…

  • no_vaseline says:

    Remember folks, this isn’t happening in your neighborhood. Only the bad parts of Santa Ana, Cypress, and Anaheim.

    Oh, and that dump Villages of Columbus.

    Irvine 92606 $593,000 -23.2% 11 -8.3%

  • ozajh says:

    In a couple of weeks the YOY comps will almost certainly start showing a far less negative trend. (Next week might be really ugly, though.)

    The reason will probably not be because the market has reached bottom, but because there was a HUMONGOUS fall in the existing home median between August and September 2007.

    Just sayin’ this in advance, ‘cos you just KNOW we’re going to see a pile of ‘light at the end of the tunnel’ opinions if the comps get less bad.

  • crispy&cole says:

    Its in the bag - LMFAO!!!

    Gary watts, what a fool!

  • own_home says:

    the price will continue to drop.
    http://www.patrick.net/housing
    dont buy until 2012

  • lee in irvine says:

    Per DataQuick, Single Family Median Home Price:

    2006 ~ Month End

    $690,000 = Feb ~ Watts 15% “In The Bag” for SFH
    $695,000 = Mar
    $705,000 = Apr
    $705,000 = May
    $700,000 = Jun
    $699,000 = Jul ~ Watts revises forecast to “11%” for SFH
    $685,000 = Aug
    $680,000 = Sep
    $665,000 = Oct
    $660,000 = Nov
    $665,000 = Dec ~ “we could be in for a very big surprise.”
    2007 ~ Month End

    $675,000 = Jan ~ Watts forecast “7%” SFH
    $675,000 = Feb
    $695,000 = Mar
    $720,000 = Apr
    $695,000 = May
    $734,000 = Jun ~ Peak of O.C. Housing Bubble
    $718,000 = Jul
    $710,000 = Aug
    $655,000 = Sep
    $650,000 = Oct
    $655,000 = Nov
    $600,000 = Dec

    2008 ~ Weekly ~ Month End

    $583,250 = Jan ~ Watts declares “Pent up Demand”
    $575.000 = Feb
    $570,000 = Mar ~ Thoughtful declares “bottom”
    $555,000 = Apr
    $537,000 = May
    $550,000 = Jun ~ Watts apologizes “I Got it Wrong”
    $515,000 = Jul
    $505,000 = 08/06
    $499,500 = 08/13
    $500,000 = 08/20

    Per DataQuick, this loss represents a $234,000 decline in single family home prices from the June 2007 high. And the beat goes on … and on … and on!

  • awgee says:

    What is the zip code for Corona del Mar? You know, that area that is immune to the decrease in prices?

  • Mulliganville says:

    Well Awgee, it is the area that is down 1.2% over the last 12 months. Compared to the county as a whole…it seems to be doing OK.

  • Scott says:

    To put that $200,000 after tax loss in perspective, it is:

    2.5 years of OC median household income
    3.5 years of OC median household after tax pay
    7 years of OC median household housing expense (at 30% of gross pay)

    Even for a household making $150,000, it is:

    1.25 years of gross income
    2 years of after tax income
    4 years of housing expense (at 30% of gross pay)

  • Samson says:

    I know for a fact that I saved over 125K by not buying in April of 2007. The same complex I am looking at, same floor plan same size units are 125K off from the price in 2007.

    Im so glad I didnt listen to the lender I had and the realtor that was pushing it.

  • Helen Highwater says:

    From Jay Brinkman

    But Brinkmann pointed out that the overall delinquency rate was driven by loans that were 90 days or more past due and those that were in California and Florida. The 30-day delinquency rate was below levels seen in 2002, he said.

  • yes Helen, I hope you are right because with unemployment rate going up to 6.1% in August, those people need all the help they can get. Imagine what would happen if we didn’t have those loans modifications. The unemployment rate in OC has more than doubled since 2005. That is a disaster.The stock market is down another 130 points today.

  • Here says:

    Almost bought a house for $549k one year ago, but I backed out when the mortgage crisis started and couldn’t find a GOOD loan. The house is now worth $363k. Because I was smart enough NOT to take a bad loan, I saved myself $186k.

    I also looked at another house in Rancho they ended up selling for $614k. This was before I backed out of the other deal. Whomever lived there couldn’t afford it and lost the house. House just sold for $406k. A loss of $208k.

    This is going to continue till home prices come back to where lenders will loan money to people looking to buy. No loans = no home purchases. And the downward spiral continues.

  • mav says:

    …..RealtorDave….

    ……. what you don’t get…..
    …… is that the prices that low end homes….
    …… are going for right now……
    …… are the prices that mid range homes….
    …… will be going for in a few years…..
    …… guess what happens to the low end?…..
    ……. i’ll tell you: it goes even lower…..

    ….. qualified buyers are jumping in too early….
    …… they are called knife catchers…..
    ….. every day the pool of qualified buyers shrinks…
    ….. every day the pool gets smarter……

  • ReloMan,

    This is simple basic math.
    Housing price declines have to slow because if they keep going down at the same rate, they will be (0) zero very soon. Obviously, that is not going to be the case. Homes are worth something. They have a value but it is definitely still lower than it currently is.
    Today’s housing numbers are being compared to last year’s which were already pretty bad, given the fact that the credit crunch was already in full force. As we continue on in this pricing correction, housing prices will be compared to the most recent even more depressed prices so you should see slower rates of declines but declines nevertheless.
    Even when prices eventually reach bottom, don’t expect the market to turn around and start going up. We can have a flat market for years which mean that adjusted to inflation prices will continue to fall.
    With the economy losing more than 80,000 jobs per month, there are not enough employed people to keep buying houses.

  • RealtorDaveE Says: “I’ve been telling sellers to sell for at least three years”

    I don’t remember reading any postings from you here telling people to sell, but then again, you are a realtor.
    If somebody remembers RealtorDave telling people to sell, please correct me.

    I do remember you saying for almost a year that the bottom was pretty close. Before that, I don’t know what the heck you were doing but certainly not here warning people of the housing bubble.

  • RealtorDaveE Says: “There are lots of buyers waiting on the sideline,”

    I also know of a lot of sellers waiting on the sideline for the first signs of a recovery so they can dump their investment properties on the market. Particularly here in Newport Beach, I see a lot of people saying: “I want to sell my home but not at these prices”, “I’ll test the market next Spring”

    I remember you realtors saying that real estate prices was all about employment. Well, guess what? We are losing jobs (80K+ in August alone). Where are your new buyers going to come from when people are losing their jobs?

  • ReloMan says:

    I understand the math (as you said, simple basic . . ). My question was in regards to the credibility of the Global Insight and National City studies.

    My clients are employers in the area and are asking about the long term health of the real estate market in LA/OC. Regardless of the unemployment numbers, they are still having a difficult time filling certain types of positions

  • they are down says:

    I’m going to share something very interesting. I have a search built in Ziprealty with the following parameters:

    SFR, 1250+ sq ft, 3+bed, 2+bath, $500K or below in:
    Aliso Viejo
    Costa Mesa
    Foothill Ranch
    HB
    Ladera Ranch
    Laguna Hills
    Laguna Niguel
    Lake Forest
    Mission Viejo
    Tustin
    Portola Hills
    Rancho Santa Margarita

    When I run that search as of this morning it shows 184 properties matching those parameters. I asked my realtor to set me up with a search with the same parameters but to EXCLUDE SHORT SALES.

    Guess how many properties that search yielded????

    86…

  • Jimmy2 says:

    bubble said:

    “Particularly here in Newport Beach, I see a lot of people saying: “I want to sell my home but not at these prices””

    bubble, good point. Why sell for 2M when you can get 3M if you wait. Remember, the owner likely purchased for 500K.

  • “My question was in regards to the credibility of the Global Insight and National City studies. ”

    I don’t know them well enough but what they are saying seems reasonable to me.

    “Regardless of the unemployment numbers, they are still having a difficult time filling certain types of positions”

    well, home prices are still too high. That is the main reason why many people don’t want to take relocate here. Salaries are not high enough (like they are in NYC or SF) to justify somebody to move here to pay these prices to live in the suburbs. So tell your employers that the market is correcting this and in a couple of years it will be much more affordable to own a home in the OC.

  • Orcian says:

    Lee in Irvine, maybe you can add next to August 2006 that Gary Watts declared that the bottom is near. He was off by a few years!

  • Mulliganville says:

    Welcome Back Dave…since you are in the RE profession, Bubbs and his ilk, most notably rants, have already formulated a “factual” opinion that you caused this nonsense. They swipe with the broadest of brushes 24/7. They have a disdain with the RE community as a whole. They may prefer the cockroach to you, myself, and others. This blog has turned into a typical far-left whack-job lovefest of moveon.org mentalities. The blamers vs. everyone affiliated with the industry at some minute level.

  • Bogey says:

    RE DAVE AT IT AGAIN…LOLLL!!!

    RE DAVE SAYS: “the bottom’s probably a few months off”

    This is more of the same nonsense from RE people who helped cultivate the accelerating ‘bust’. YOUR INDUSTRY IS 1/3 RESPONSIBLE.

    Making such a claim (especially on an RE blog) only makes you look un-professional and foolish.

    THE HARD DATA AND ECONOMIC LANDSCAPE DOES NOT SUPPORT YOUR POV.

  • rants says:

    how can we even be close to a bottom in prices
    if the economy is going into a severe recession?
    WE CANT
    the government says the unemployment rate is now 6.1%
    which means its really about 10%
    how the hell can prices stop dropping in that type of
    economic environment–they cant– and the really scary
    part is were in the early stages of this meaning its
    going to get worse alot worse

    fasten your survival seat belts dear readers

  • meltdown says:

    I dont think its important to go back in history and dig up quotes. If you were wrong, dont be afraid to change your views / opinions. If you were right then congratulations. The market is dynamic, so should your views and opinions.

    If only people allowed themselves to change their own views, they wouldn’t have been left holding the bag.

    “Successful speculation begins with objective observation.” - B. Shannon

  • Mulliganville says:

    Just curious: when the semi-conductor industry was suppressed, were the salespeople responsible for that too?

    Bogey: He who controls the money controls the business. Buyers were greedy, but money was easy. Lenders were greedy and loose and gave money to virtually anyone with a pulse. Here is where you miss it: The buyers would have purchased anyways…regardless of what the agent told them to do. You do not talk someone into spending that kind of jack. They have made the decision to purchase. What, did the car salesman talk you into buying that car? Or did he/she facilitate it for you? Come on…use your noggin.

  • Active Buyer says:

    dafox - I think what is missing is the fact that not every area in OC has the same median income. If you include that modification than I think once houseing gets between 4x and 5x of the median for the area (may be a zip, but in some cases will be smaller) that area will be at bottom.

  • dafox says:

    ABuyer-

    And not all houses are equally priced in OC either. Thats why you have to look at median-to-median. And if many peoples’ claim is right where the median is being pulled down by the low end market, and the true value is higher - well that means its even more unaffordable.
    If you have a better apples to apples comparison, I’m all ears.

    Also, redfins’ neighborhood demographics are good too. The few I’ve seen in Huntington Beach (where we’d like to buy eventually), the multiplier is still > 6

  • lee in irvine says:

    Gary “In the Bag” Watts at his absolute best! Pay special attention to the first quote, “Look mom, no hands!”:

    10/23/2005 ~ “I only forecast off the numbers … It’s all based on pure economics.” ~ Orange County Register

    02/13/2006 ~ “Fifteen percent is pretty much in the bag for Orange County in 2006 … It’s impossible for prices to go down this year.” ~ Fortune Magazine

    07/21/2006 ~ “I think we probably are not going to see 15 (percent), but I think 11 or 12 (percent) is still realistic.” ~ Orange County Register

    07/22/2006 ~ “”August ought to be the last month of weak appreciation numbers.” ~ Orange County Register

    07/22/2006 ~ “I really think that we are pretty close to the bottom of our real estate prices … August ought to be the last month of weak appreciation numbers.” ~ Orange County Register

    12/31/2006 ~ “If the un-motivated sellers stay out of the market, we could be in for a very big surprise.” ~ Orange County Register

    01/01/2008 ~ “Cyclical housing downturns have always occurred. The good news is these situations do not last forever. The cycles tend to run approximately 27 to 36 months, so this cyclical downturn should run its course by summer.” ~ Impact Real Estate Jan 2008 Housing & Economic Forecast

    06/23/2008 ~ “I apologize for not knowing what Wall Street did to our mortgages” … “I had no idea how Wall Street restructured these loans.” ~ Orange County Register

  • stashingmycash says:

    1. Looking at the local numbers for homes going into foreclosure, there’s good evidence that defaults may have peaked. This is corroborated by what I’m seeing in the field.

    1. The recasts of option arms and ALT-A will be the next cyle. There could be a lull but expect them to effect the industry this winter. This is what I see from recast charts.

    2. The various work-out and bail-out programs are, indeed having a positive effect.

    2. As the article I posted indicates they may be slowing forceclosures slightly but are they just delaying half of them with not actually modifying the terms but creating a repayment schedule on the same terms?

    3. If unemployment increases, mortgage rates will decline, so there’s an element of self-correction there. Many potential buyers still have stable jobs. We’re talking 6% or 7% unemployment–not 100%!

    3. The rates may go down but will confidence rise in terms of job stability and security? Will people want to give up lower rents and the ease of mobility to get locked into a long term debt? Will they want to empty thier savings during a time of high unemployment?

    4. The market cycle always makes year-end a good time to buy. (See “Predictions 101: Our 2 market cycles“)

    4. This is in a normal RE cycle but this is by no means i this a normal RE cycle.

    I understand what you are saying but I see too many areas of concern. Too many unanswered questions that lead me to believe bottom will not happen until min. 2010.

  • Active Buyer says:

    I agree that not all OC RE is priced equally. If you believe the economic numbers posted in redfin or zip reality (what I use to monitor areas) in areas like HB you have to scratch your head and wonder how people who make the displayed “average” can afford the houses - can they all really be that good at investing, or are the numbers dated/skewed somehow?

    On a different topic, I do not see how the unemployment number impacts the average person thinking to buy RE. If a family is worried about their job/income than they would not be looking to buy in the first place.

    In today’s business world there is no such thing as 100% job security. For this reason alone it is important to be constantly monitoring the overall job market and refining your skill set to stay in synch.

  • Good post…Buy Houses Now. I totally agree. The real question is…What is the new normal? Credit spreads will never get back down to where they were, you are not going to see the existing or new home sales remotely approach what we saw during the boom years. This isn’t just the OC, this is something we are looking at as a nation. The new normal is going to disappoint many of those ready to jump back on the speculative bubble bandwagon that no longer has any wheels.

  • Scott A says:

    Median is $200 K

    $2,250.00 a month less with taxes & Ins.

    New howmes 45% OFF
    This is money……………………………………….
    This is what I have been talking about…………..

    Buying new from a builder going broke…………………

    New homes are still the best deal out there…………if you can afford it….

  • dafox says:

    Active Buyer-
    “areas like HB you have to scratch your head and wonder how people who make the displayed “average” can afford the houses ”
    My wife and I have been doing *exactly* that for the past 8 months. I want to go interview all these people buying 700k homes and ask how the heck they’re doing it.

    As for “If a family is worried about their job/income than they would not be looking to buy in the first place.” - exactly. thats why current volume is SO low right now. And with volume so low, prices have to come down in order to entice buyers. its called a sale! :)

  • Mulliganville says:

    Lee is back to mancrushing Gary Watts. I hope Gary is unlisted.

  • Active Buyer Says: “On a different topic, I do not see how the unemployment number impacts the average person thinking to buy RE.”

    Wow, I’m still trying to recover from this last statement.
    You should pursue a career in Economics.

    If unemployment rate goes up, there are fewer people that can buy homes which means prices have to come down to get people to buy.

    At the same time, people who lose their jobs might also lose their homes, adding to the already high inventory and further depressing prices.

    Let me remind you that the days of buying a home without a job or assets are gone.

  • now if you want to buy a home when prices are declining, I have some condos in Miami to sell you.

  • pdu says:

    # awgee Says:
    ‘What is the zip code for Corona del Mar? You know, that area that is immune to the decrease in prices?’
    # Mulliganville Says:
    “Well Awgee, it is the area that is down 1.2% over the last 12 months. Compared to the county as a whole…it seems to be doing OK”.

    Awgee,

    Your question didn’t really get a straight answer from the “professional” realtor.

    The zip for CdM is 92625.

    Not sure those numbers are anything more than comparing the 22 business days in August to the same period last year, however it does show a couple of interesting things.

    The median did drop only 1.2% from that period last year; not much, just about $1715/month loss…….chump change. When you take inflation into effect — Jimmy’s biggie:) — it does start to have an impact.

    Additionally, sales were down (the infamous volumetric averages) :)) by 46.7% to 8 sales. There are aprroximately 200 homes listed so we have a lot of imbalance with the supply/demand issue. Unless the rules no longer apply you should expect a significant drop in prices before seeing an increase in sales.

    Think of it this way…….. 200 listings — a lot of people spending a lot of time and effort (To say nothing of the money) to sell 8 properties. There are also, obviously, a lot of owners out there spending time and money while their overpriced properties languish on the MLS. Well over half those good people have already reduced their price since their homes were currently listed.

    The skies over CdM are still a bit hazy this year.
    ………………but, I know you know all this:)

  • bpsqwerty says:

    wheeeee!

  • Mulliganville says:

    Sorry pdu, my guess is awgee is a pretty smart guy. He does not need to ask the blog for the zip code, when you can maps.google.com and “poof” there it is!

    pdu, why do you have to be such a saphead?

  • Bill says:

    National Bubble,

    Thanks for taking the time to look up realtordave’s repeated bottom calls.

    I also remembered him calling a bottom this spring, this summer and this winter as well as next spring, summer….etc.

    When he makes comments like “We may not hit bottom until 2010, but I think there’s a very good chance we’ll hit it this winter” he forgets to tell you that if his 2010 prediction is true and you buy now, you have a very good chance of losing 25% -35% of your home’s value.

    Coined phrases like “I’m in this business for the long term” and “For most people there really is more to life than market timing” means prices are certain to drop considerably more than what you will be paying for it.

    Sorry realtordave but Sighburrdood already played those cards in here.

    This blog would be a whole lot better without the subtle, sneaky sales schemes that try to make it past the bloggers.

  • pdu says:

    Mulli,
    Just mocking your one-sided response to his post.
    ……but you knew that already, too. Right?

    You took his post mocking the situation in CdM and tried to twist it into a positive picture of the CdM situation.

    You needn’t try to chastise another for responding to a post with facts. Go sell a house, or something.

  • nimhrat says:

    dafox, interesting post regarding the historical multiplier of median price vs median income. I wonder if the historical multiplier of 4.7 includes the recent unprecedented boom. I would be interested in what that historical average would be if years after 2001 were excluded. Does anyone know where I can get data to make such a calculation, perhaps by area/zip? I’m currently interested in the West LA area as well as OC…

  • Bogey says:

    Mulliganville Says:Sept 5th, 2008 at 10:06 am…… Bogey: He who controls the money controls the business. Buyers were greedy, but money was easy. Lenders were greedy and loose and gave money to virtually anyone with a pulse. Here is where you miss it: The buyers would have purchased anyways…regardless of what the agent told them to do.

    HELLO MULLIGANHEAD.

    Yes, you’re actually correct for a change :) But, you are the one who is not using the noggin.

    I SAID …. “THE RE INDUSTRY WAS 1/3 RESPONSIBLE FOR CULTIVATING THE BUST”

    THAT WAS YOUR QUE TO CHIME-IN AND ASK WHO THE OTHER 2/3 WERE … BUT YOU MISSED THE BOAT AGAIN.

    THE OTHER 2/3 OF THE EQUATION INCLUDE:

    * MORTGAGE INDUSTRY
    * IGNORANT BUYERS

    RE agents were the primary enablers. They were there to assure reluctant buyers that …

    “RE only goes up in OC-

    There is nothing to worry about regarding ARM’s-

    There’s plenty of time between the resets to boost income-

    Better hurry before you miss out, there are 10 other offers on the table-

    You really want this house, let’s bid 20k higher to crush all other offers” And on and on and on.

    So, as you can see, we agree.

  • awgee says:

    Shoot, I just wrote a doggone book and “wordpress” dorked me.

  • pdu says:

    awgee,

    That’s OK.
    Those you were addressing already know everything.

  • Mulliganville says:

    Nope Bogey…the lenders were the primary enablers…they loaned the cash. Without it, no deal would have been done. RE agents could have talked til they were blue in the face…no loan, no home. Why is this sooooooooooo hard for the bears den to comprehend? It’s a real head-scratcher.

  • Buy Houses Now! says:

    I’d blame Wall Street peddlers of fake AAA securities before the lenders that supplied them with poor quality mortgages. That’s where the fraud occurred. The Countrywide’s were just supplying what the secondary market demanded of them.

  • New2OC says:

    Mulliganville,

    Not sure why the blame can’t be spread. I was out with realtors, and I said, “Gee, how the heck can I afford this? It costs a lot and I don’t have a downpayment.”

    Realtor response: “Don’t worry, I know a broker who can get you the mortgage you need to buy this house.”

    “You better act fast on this house”

    Instead of looking out for MY interests (buying a house I can afford), they were ALWAYS pushing that any house was affordable and that I shouldn’t worry about the details. If I put a top range at $700,000, they would bring me to $800,000 houses.

    I’ve dumped those realtors, but realtors certainly were the enablers.

  • Mulliganville says:

    Nope New2OC. No money no house. You have to understand that the underwriters were the true enablers here. The guardians to the safe if you will. THEY approved people on teaser rates. THEY loaned money on stated income. THEY did not verify approval on actual income. THEY thought they would just take back the home and sell it for more if the buyer defaulted.

    Those homes were going to sell during that time. So the agents, by saying, if you want it you better move on it were right. Was it a good buy? Uh, no. But, buyers would miss out on one home as they did not move quick enough, therefore, they would move quicker next time around. It was the reality of the boom years. But guess what? If the lenders did their job and approved people on the proper ratios, we would not be here now would we…regardless of what agents said.

    There are idiots in every industry. As soon as I hear “always, never, forever, etc.” from a salesperson, they are blowing smoke.

    But again, how is the middle-man the enabler?

    BHN, I agree with Wall St. being responsible. If they were not scooping them up by the carload and the underwriters actually did their job, we could have avoided some of this carnage.

  • dafox says:

    Mulli is right - you can have all the pushy sales people, fraudulent appraisals, and wall st honkies wanting more and more. But if the underwriting standards didnt relax, it wouldnt have mattered - the money wouldnt have been available.

  • New2OC says:

    Mulliganville and dafox:

    I ultimately believe the buyer is at fault, personal responsibility and all. If it doesn’t make sense, you shouldn’t do it.

    But, the realtors knew the loan brokers that could get you the loan, so they helped grease the skids. They knew who to put you in touch with to get the deal done. I’m sure many of them got a share of that business too.

    The real estate agents knew that people could get easy money loans, so they pointed people in the direction of more expensive houses (and a larger commission check).

    Are you two saying that realtors have NO blame in this?

  • yammajamma says:

    Muli:
    First post after reading posts for a long time and not responding. Saying that the Realtors have no responsibility is asinine. The person pushing you to the loan, giving bad advice, is in it JUST for the money and not for the best interests of the client has at least SOME fault. Open your brain a little please. Realtors WERE at fault!

    On what Realtor Dave says, he’s playing both sides of the coin.
    -if the bottom IS this winter, he wins. (I told you so, he will say)
    -if the bottom is not, he wins again (he’ll forward you to this quote: “possibility of Could the bottom still be 16 months off? Definitely. I think it’s more likely going to occur this December, and that by February we’ll be seeing a marked decline in inventory and even more competition for REOs.”

    lol, nice job.

  • yammajamma says:

    I should have also said, then we shouldn’t blame drug dealers. They didn’t MAKE the drugs, they just sold it. Only arrest the growers in Colombia and not the people pushing the drugs.

  • “I was allowing the possibility that a bottom might be sooner than the 2010 ”

    Still, you knew very well that prices were going to come down and I never ever ever heard you say “if you are a buyer, do not buy now because prices are coming down big time. Rent for a while and then buy”

    And don’t give me the BS that nobody could’ve predicted it because by August last year we all knew that the bubble had finally burst. Nobody knew the exact amount of drop in prices but a drop of at least 15% was almost inevitable given the huge increases during the boom. Well, 15% in a 700K home is 105K. That is a lot of money for the typical OC family.

    Also, don’t give me the BS that if you are going to live there for at least 10 years, you shouldn’t care how much you pay for your house because you’ll be fine long term.
    Buying at the very peak of the market is a very costly mistake. When a buyer hires a realtor, he/she expects the realtor to give them honest advice, not just to show them a few places for sale, and pocket the commission.

  • not buying it says:

    I thought this posted but apparently it did not:

    RealtorDave: When you state the existence of pent up demand - I assume you mean people that CAN buy that are sitting on the sidelines.

    When you look at the numbers - I agree that there are people who can buy sitting on the sidelines, but there is little evidence that we will see the same purchasing power void of a change in lending standards.

    How many folks do you see leveraging the 3.5% down FHA loans to buy anything more than a $450K or less home?

    I think you can see where I am getting at.

    Just curious what numbers you are going off of to be able to characterize pent up demand to the point of being able to use that information in a prediction for the future of this market.

    Second - you mentioned that you just purchased as well.

    Well here’s a question for you that I hope you answer honestly: the deal you got on that REO - could any first time home buyer, with no contacts other than a run of the mill agent, have obtained the same deal you got?

    I am referring to agents leveraging “inside” deals that are basically great discounts, priced well below the current market price - let alone peak - and is almost instant equity.

    I have yet to see a first time home buyer or even someone looking to invest in another property have the kind of resources and contacts to get a deal that we all know will never make it into the hands of the typical buyer.

    I just purchased as well - and I know there is no way someone trying to purchase just a single property would have gotten such a deal. I believe that the deal you got probably would fall into that same category as well.

    I hear it from brokers and lenders all the time - it would just be nice to put these deals into perspective so the readers could understand what deals are out there for them.

    Provider mentioned something similar. She got a screaming deal that was obviously such a great deal she felt an urge to mention it. Unfortunately such a deal would have never happened for most of the readers here looking to get in.

    The people out there today touting their great deals as a sign the time to buy is now just need to put the actual deal in perspective. Its amazing how these kinds of comments are misconstrued by readers whom are looking to leverage a 3.5% FHA loan to get a great deal - I hear young people all the time talking about it.

    If they need to use such a loan - chances are they are not going to get the same deal as someone, say like myself, who simply used cash to get in on several properties with other investors.

    I think you can see my point.

  • hwood says:

    # Mulliganville Says:
    September 5th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

    I dont know shiny. You all namecall so often. It must be a natural reaction to build your self esteem. 3000 closings last month. Tight lending standards, yet 3000 homes closed. Please do not worry about us. We will be fine. However, I wish you nothing but success in whatever industry you are in. Have a great weekend.

    HEY MULLIGAN HEAD WHO CARES THERE WAS 3000 CLOSINGS.
    DOESNT MEAN THAT THEY WERE SMART IN BUYING A HOME …
    I CAN GIVE U MANY MONTHS IN THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS THAT THERE WAS MANY MORE CLOSINGS THAN 3000 AND THEY ALL SEEM TO BE UPSIDE DOWN NOW..

    SO ALL IT TELLS ME IS THERE IS 3000 MORE HOMES THAT WILL BE UPSIDE DOWN ALSO IN A LITTLE WHILE….

    ARE U REALLY THIS IGNORANT MULLI OR U JUST THAT DUMB AND DONT UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS…
    PLEASE WHICH ONE IF NOT ALL ARE YOU..LOLLL

  • Mulliganville says:

    Aside from Realtor Dave’s example of “Larry’s Real Estate, Loan, and Escrow Service plus Coffee and Donuts,” that was not the norm. There are always the ridiculous and unscrupulous (see hwood) there for their own personal agenda.

    I am saying that if there was no money to loan, nothing an agent said or did would have mattered one bit.

  • not buying it says:

    Mulli: “I am saying that if there was no money to loan, nothing an agent said or did would have mattered one bit.”

    yep.

    Are we still on the blame game here?

    Jon - any reason you have not yet interviewed CFO’s, SVP’s, controllers, etc. that saw their pension plans take huge hits? Or even one of the firms on Wall Street and ask them to discuss what the market is like for MBS’s?

    Does anyone here believe that we will see the same rate of return on RE investments as we did in 2002-2006 with little money from outside investors backing those MBS’s (unless its backed by the good ‘ol US taxpayer)? Leveraging the GSE’s alone definitely will not allow us to come close to seeing the same return.

    If it doesn’t have the backing of the US taxpayer, its worth nil. And that is a big problem.

    Who stated we have hit price bottom?

  • not buying it says:

    Although - when they discount those notes to pennies on the dollar - its hard for the fund and bond managers to resist.

ADVERTISEMENT
Browse Orange County, California homes for sale