Search:
powered by
Lansner on Real Estate ~ The latest news about the housing market from Orange County Register columnist Jon Lansner.

Time to change Prop. 13?

July 14th, 2008, 12:39 pm · 4 Comments · posted by Mary Ann Milbourn

blog-qmark.pngA coalition of businss and taxpayers groups that includes the Orange County Business Council is taking the offensive to head off any effort to tax California’s commercial property differently than residential.

Since Proposition 13 passed in 1978, residential and commercial property have been taxed at the same rate, 1% of the purchase price with a maximum 2% increase a year. The property is not reassessed at fair market value until it is sold.

Under a split roll, taxes on commercial property — office buildings, shopping centers, apartments — would be treated differently. It can be done different ways. Commercial property could be reassessed more often based on fair market value or taxed at a higher rate than residential. Any change in how commercial property is taxed requires a statewide vote.

Efforts to allow the so-called “split roll” tend to come up whenever the state faces fiscal problems. At least eight bills dealing with a split roll have been introduced since 1991. None ever reached the governor.

In February, Assemblyman Mike Davis, D-Los Angeles, introduced AB 2461 asking the Board of Equalization to study how much revenue would have been generated during the previous fiscal year if nonresidential commercial property had been reassessed at its fair market value the prior fiscal year. Nothing more has happened on the bill since April when its first hearing in the Assembly Revenue and Taxation was canceled.

With the legislature casting about for revenues to bridge a $15 billion budget deficit, the business community wants to start early getting the word out about its opposition to a split roll.

The group is operating under the auspices of Californians Against Higher Property Taxes. In addition to OCBC, members include the California Chamber of Commerce, California Restaurant Association, California Taxpayers’ Association, California Business Properties Association, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, California Business Roundtable, National Federation of Independent Business-California and California Retailers Association.

Here’s the California Chamber’s press release. So is it time to change Proposition 13?

Should California tax commercial property differently?
View Results

Other property tax stories…

Like this item? Click on icon to share; first one emails it!
  • e-mail
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Slashdot

4 Responses to “Time to change Prop. 13?”

  1. Marcello Says:

    sure, lower taxes. that’ll fix your crumbling infrastructure, ailing public school system, AND remove your debt.

    dear lord, the US is a tax _haven_. Ever wonder if there is a connection between your low taxes and US 50+trillion dollar total national debt ?

    wow.

  2. 76s Says:

    Prop 13 was alkways an idiotic idea that created increasing tax disparities not based on any reasonable public policy. It produces a regressive tax structure and deteriorating infrastructure. Big business interests used homeowners as dupes, getting them to crush their own long-term interests by voting for Prop 13 as a Trojan Horse to get commercial property taxes reduced. Instead of being eliminated or reformed, Prop 13 has been extended and expanded to keep the charade going. It also puts unfair taxes on new homeowners (such as your own kids!) reduceshousing supply and helped fuel the destructive real estate bubble.

  3. BozoJoe Says:

    Where in the snot did Marcello and 76s come from?

    I will guess that your renting? and collecting unemployment?

    government has 2 and only 2 legal purposes:
    1 defense (yes and police is defense)
    2 the printing of money

    AND THAT IS IT!

    Perhaps you two filthy rich person want to pay my taxes, so I can consume garbage governmental services (like universal healthcare (my ass))

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT